home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
- User Services Area
-
- Director(s):
-
-
- o Joyce Reynolds: jkrey@isi.edu
-
-
- Area Summary reported by Joyce Reyolds/Information Sciences Institute
-
- Three BOFs (Birds of a Feather) and ten Working Groups, in the User
- Services Area of the IETF, met in Columbus, Ohio.
-
- Gopher BOF (GOPHER)
-
- This BOF focused on the Gopher protocol and insuring its existence in a
- well-defined, standard fashion. Current implementations/licensing
- issues were not discussed at this meeting as it is outside the scope of
- involvement of the Chairpersons and the BOF.
-
- Comments on the current Gopher protocol (RFC 1436) were fielded and
- discussed. Discussion and consensus of moving this BOF to the
- Integration of Internet Information Resources Working Group (IIIR) for
- formal actions was approved. The GOPHER Chairs and the IIIR Chair,
- Chris Weider, will report the results of this BOF to the people working
- on Gopher at the University of Minnesota.
-
- Low Cost IP Hardware Wish List BOF (LOIP)
-
- The purpose of this BOF was to draw together interested IETFers and
- multi-vendors to define the next generation of its router/modem
- products. The issues were mostly operational (functions, features,
- price, performance). The FARNET community is interested in these issues
- because it provides services across a spectrum of users (from
- cost-conscious schools and colleges to supercomputer centers).
-
- World-Wide Web BOF (WWW)
-
- The World-Wide Web has an established user base, many compatible
- implementations, and many new ideas. This BOF discussed how the current
- WWW standards should be put into the RFC process, and what are the
- future directions for the Web.
-
- Tim Berners-Lee mentioned a few recent developments, including NCSA's
- ``Mosaic'' WWW client for X11, a windows client for MS-DOS machines, and
- the growth rate of access to the CERN server.
-
- The three ``standards'' important for WWW at this stage include the
- Universal Resource Locators specification which defines the addressing
- syntax used by WWW, the Hypertext Markup Language (HTML) specification
- that defines the transport format for menus, hypertext and general
- on-line documentation, and the HTTP access protocol which is used by WWW
-
- 1
-
-
-
-
-
- servers.
-
- Integrated Directory Services Working Group (IDS)
-
- The IDS Working Group is chartered to facilitate the integration and
- interoperability of current and future directory services into a unified
- directory service. This work will unite directory services based on a
- heterogeneous set of directory services protocols (X.500, WHOIS++,
- etc.). In addition to specifying technical requirements for the
- integration, the IDS Group will also contribute to the administrative
- and maintenance issues of directory service offerings by publishing
- guidelines on directory data integrity, maintenance, security, and
- privacy and legal issues for users and administrators of directories.
-
- The final draft of the X.500 Advanced Usages Survey was released and
- will be moved to RFC publication status. The final draft of FYI 11
- revision (``A Catalog of Available X.500 Implementations'' will be out
- in three weeks for movement to RFC publication. The Pilot Project
- Catalog was not released in time for review and discussion for this
- IETF.
-
- The Whois++ - X.500 Interoperability document was assigned to Chris
- Weider and Mark Prior. The Whois++ Implementation Catalog will be
- assigned at the next IETF in Amsterdam. The ``Directory Administrator's
- Guide'' has been assigned to a team of 7 people and will be called,
- ``The Directory Policy Handbook'' A ``Directory Users Rights'' document
- will be discussed at the next IETF.
-
- Integration of Internet Information Resources Working Group (IIIR)
-
- IIIR is chartered to facilitate interoperability between Internet
- Information Services, and to develop, specify, and align protocols
- designed to integrate the plethora of Internet information services
- (WAIS, archie, Prospero, etc.) into a single ``virtually unified
- information service''.
-
- The Agenda included: the introduction and correction of Minutes from
- last meeting, discussions on a Resource Transponder document, and the
- draft, ``Vision of Integrated Information Services document'' A taxonomy
- document was discussed, but not assigned at this session. The Gopher
- protocol work will be brought into IIIR.
-
- Internet School Networking Working Group (ISN)
-
- The Internet School Networking Working Group is chartered to facilitate
- the connection of the United States' K-12 (Kindergarten through 12th
- Grade) schools, public and private, to the Internet, and school
- networking in general.
-
- Gene Hastings led a discussion on his draft document of connectivity
- models. Jennifer Sellers discussed ISN's FAQ draft document. Jon
- Postel described the history and concept of domain names, and the United
-
- 2
-
-
-
-
-
- States domain. K12 placement in the naming system was discussed. Art
- St. George and Connie Stout went over new/updated ISN goals and
- milestones.
-
- The Network Information Services Infrastructure Working Group (NISI)
-
- NISI is exploring the requirements for common, shared Internet-wide
- network information services. The goal is to develop an understanding
- for what is required to implement an information services
- ``infrastructure'' for the Internet.
-
- The NISI Working Group discussed the current relationships between NICs
- of different ``levels'' especially as they relate to the roles of the
- new InterNIC and to NISI. From this discussion, new goals were defined,
- including writing an informational paper describing these NIC roles and
- relationships and starting work toward developing guidelines for
- coordinating cooperative user assistance when more than one NIC is
- involved.
-
- Network Training Materials Working Group (TRAINMAT)
-
- The Network Training Materials Working Group is chartered to enable the
- research community to make better use of the networked services.
- Towards this end, the Working Group will work to provide a comprehensive
- package of ``mix and match'' training materials for the broad academic
- community which will: 1) enable user support staff to train users to
- use the networked services and 2) provide users with self-paced learning
- material. In the first instance, it will not deal with operational
- training. This Working Group is the IETF component of a joint RARE/IETF
- group working on Network Training Materials.
-
- Thirty people attended the Working Group session to discuss training.
- This is the first official meeting of the group following a BOF at the
- last IETF in Washington, D.C. The group discussed a current, on-going
- project at the University of Newcastle, UK, to catalog training
- materials and agreed to use this work as the basis for an informational
- RFC on training materials. Jill Foster lead the discussion on a
- template to be used to catalog the materials. The template has been
- developed based on input from several other projects, including NIR,
- IAFA, and the Coalition for Networked Information's TopNode. The group
- had open discussions on what is needed in training materials and what
- projects are being worked on. The group agreed to work on an informal
- posting system to the USWG mailing list to share information about
- training aimed at the trainers. (This working group is a joint project
- with RARE ISUS.)
-
- Networked Information Retrieval Working Group (NIR)
-
- NIR is chartered to increase the useful base of information about
- networked information retrieval tools, their developers, interested
- organizations, and other activities that relate to the production,
- dissemination, and support of NIR tools. NIR is a cooperative effort of
-
- 3
-
-
-
-
-
- the IETF, RARE, and CNI.
-
- Updates were provided by Jane Smith on the Clearinghouse for Networked
- Information Discovery and Retrieval, and Jill Foster on the RARE ISUS
- Working Group NIR activities. The Working Group reviewed the draft
- Status Report on NIR tools and groups (version 3.0) and reviewed the
- templates in light of experience in completing them. Dates were
- scheduled for the next revision and the next step of evaluation of the
- various tools.
-
- Uniform Resource Identifiers Working Group (URI)
-
- URI is chartered to define a set of standards for the encoding of system
- independent Resource Location and Identification information for the use
- of Internet information services.
-
- URI held three sessions at this IETF. Sessions one and two focused on
- Uniform Resource Locators (URLs). In the first session, Tim Berners-Lee
- led a discussion of URLs and review of the draft URL document.
- Incorporation of final changes to the draft were discussed, and it is
- hoped that the document will be an Internet-Draft before the Amsterdam
- meeting in July. The second session included presentation and
- discussion of proposals for URIs (open admission) and discussion of
- transitioning to UR*s. It was agreed that the URI document will be
- ready for the Amsterdam IETF. Session three focused on future plans
- beyond URLs and URIs.
-
- After much spirited discussion, URI was able to finalize both the URL
- documents (which will now be submitted as Internet-Drafts) and a
- conceptual and syntactical framework for Uniform Resource Names (URNs).
- Documents will be written for URNs and should be submitted to the list
- in the next couple of weeks. Work continues to define elements needed
- for these objects to be useful to the end-user.
-
- User Documents Revisions (USERDOC2)
-
- The USERDOC2 Working Group is preparing a revised bibliography of
- on-line and hard copy documents, reference materials, and training tools
- addressing general networking information and how to use the Internet.
- The target audience includes those individuals who provide services to
- end users and end users themselves.
-
- The short bibliography is now complete and has been submitted to the
- User Services Area Director as a first step in becoming an official FYI
- RFC. The ``Introducing the Internet'' document archive which contains
- the files documented in the short bibliography is on-line at four sites
- and four other sites have expressed interest in mirroring the files for
- anonymous FTP. Merit has the files in Gopher and WAIS. The group's next
- project is completing a comprehensive bibliography to supplement RFC
- 1175. A first draft was distributed and discussed, with a final version
- to be completed by the next IETF in Amsterdam. Future goals were
- considered, including a new FYI aimed at those who are not connected to
-
-
- 4
-
-
-
-
-
- the Internet, a documents location system aimed at making materials in
- the long bibliography available, and consideration of developing
- materials aimed specifically at making information available to help
- librarians. The first of these projects will be started by looking at
- materials already produced by several Working Group members.
-
- User Services Working Group (USWG)
-
- The USWG provides a regular forum for people interested in all user
- services to identify and initiate projects designed to improve the
- quality of information available to end-users of the Internet.
-
- Joyce Reynolds reported on the IETF User Services Area activities
- including: Working Groups coming to closure, new Working groups
- starting up, new publications, and current User Services related
- Internet-Drafts postings. Discussion also focused on the ``new NICs''
- (i.e., the InterNIC and the proposed/experimental APNIC - Asia/Pacific
- NIC). Jill Foster presented an update on RARE activities, including a
- report on the RARE Information Services/User Services (ISUS) activities.
- Susan Calcari presented a talk on the new InterNIC.
-
- Gary Malkin led a session on two FYI RFC updates; FYI 7 ``FYI on
- Questions and Answers: Answers to Commonly Asked ``Experienced Internet
- User'' Questions'' (Also RFC 1207), February 1991 and FYI 4 ``FYI on
- Questions and Answers: Answers to Commonly asked ``New Internet User''
- Questions'' (Also RFC 1325), May 1992.
-
- Whois and Network Information Lookup Service (WNILS)
-
- The purpose of WNILS is to expand and define the standard for WHOIS
- services, to resolve issues associated with the variations in access,
- and to promote a consistent and predictable service across the network.
-
- Peter Deutsch led a review of Whois++ - Architecture. Dave Crocker
- briefly presented his two drafts to the WNILS session. Chris Weider led
- a review of Distributed Whois++ Model - Centroids, and Jim Fullton lead
- a review of Front End to Database Integration.
-
- Discussion of Projects: A simple server, centroid and client will be
- available by April 30. Sources will be available on ftp.cnidr.org. The
- working group also discussed and revised their goals and milestones.
-
-
-
- 5
-